Tuesday, May 13, 2008

Finally, an Amazonian Argument


(Courtesy Ananya)

"Amid this edenic simplicity, two things appalled the European scientist, the Miranya ate human flesh, and they were active slave raiders. When Martius interrogated a Miranya chief about his eating human meat the Indian gave a reasoned answer:

"whites do not like to eat crocodiles or monkeys even though they are tasty. But if they had fewer turtles and pigs they certainly would eat them-for hunger hurts. All this is merely a question of habit. When I kill an enemy, it is better to eat him than to let him rot: for big game is rare, since it does not lay eggs as turtles do. Death itself is worse than being eaten. If I am killed, it would be of no concern to me, whether or not [my enemies] the Omagua ate me. In fact, I know no game that tastes better [human flesh]-although you whites are too sour."

Despite the good taste of human meat, the Miranya chief said that he would always prefer to sell a captive to the whites than eat him, "for Cachaca rum tastes even better than blood."

(From John Hemming, Amazon Frontier, 212, 3rd full paragraph).


Ananya Chakravarti (note the 'v') is a student of history, increasingly bemoaning the lack of cannibalism amidst Brahmins in Goa.

0 comments: